Colin Van Beem vs Timo Nieminen Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W L W L
Form
W L L L L L L L L LHead To Head: Beem 1 - 1 Nieminen
They have played 6 sets in total, with Beem winning 3 and Nieminen winning 3. The last match between Beem and Nieminen was at the Sweden F2, 06-05-2013, First, Clay with Colin Van Beem getting the victory 3-6 6-2 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Colin Van Beem | 1 |
| Timo Nieminen | 1 |
Sweden F2(06-05-2013)
3
6
6
2
7
6
| Beem | Stats | Nieminen |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 537 | Highest Rank | 254 |
| 32 | Age | 43 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 12 |
| 56% (191-153) | Career Total W/L | 58% (429-311) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $1,300 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 7-6(5) | |||||
| 0-6 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 28 | Games Won | 26 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats 
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Timo Nieminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Guillermo Olaso
Player
Timo Nieminen
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthias Bachinger
Player
Timo Nieminen
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 7-6(11) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rameez Junaid
Player
Timo Nieminen
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
46%
(
37 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Timo Nieminen
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Timo Nieminen
Player
Andreas Siljestrom
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
0
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (191/153) | Win/Loss | 58% (429/311) |
| 54% (426/359) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (951/729) |
| 52% (3679/3387) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (8027/7006) |
| 60% (49/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (40/30) |
| 55% (139/115) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (245/169) |
| 38% (3/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (141/107) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 387 | Aces Total | 62 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 382 | Total Double Faults | 210 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 127.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.58 |
| 57% (6528/11358) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1704/2849) |
| 65% (4242/6528) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1044/1704) |
| 48% (2338/4830) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (489/1145) |
| 45% (609/1364) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (148/374) |
| 43% (5066/11648) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1278/2952) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 18% (2/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 24% (5/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 29% (2/5) | Challenger W/L | 50% (101/100) |
| 56% (189/148) | Futures W/L | 64% (321/184) |
| 55% (187/337) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (420/723) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 30% (3/10) |
| 45% (30/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/155) |
| 54% (54/100) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (99/191) |
| 87% (189/165) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (410/359) |
| 13% (189/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (410/51) |
| 17% (155/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (330/70) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
